RFC 1034:DOMAIN NAMES - CONCEPTS AND FACILITIES
RFC-Ref

Name Space


Click on the red underlined text to get to the source

... make changes visible to the Internet at large. Organizations also wanted some local structure on the name space. ...
... RFC-819, RFC-830]. The proposals varied, but a common thread was the idea of a hierarchical name space, with the hierarchy roughly corresponding to organizational structure, and names using "." as the character to mark the boundary between hierarchy ...
... The primary goal is a consistent name space which will be used for referring to resources. In order to avoid the problems caused by ad hoc encodings ...
... will become more and more expensive and difficult, and hence should be avoided. The same principle holds for the structure of the name space, and in particular mechanisms for creating and deleting names; these should also be distributed. ...
... Because we want the name space to be useful in dissimilar networks and applications, we provide the ability to use the ...
... networks and applications, we provide the ability to use the same name space with different protocol families or management. For example, host ...
... RESOURCE RECORDS, which are specifications for a tree structured name space and data associated with the names. Conceptually, each node and leaf ...
... name server is said to be an AUTHORITY for these parts of the name space. Authoritative information is organized into units called ZONEs, and these zones can be automatically distributed to the name servers which provide ...


... Name space specifications and terminology ...
... tree structure or rules for selecting labels; its goal is to be as general as possible, so that it can be used to build arbitrary applications. In particular, the system was designed so that the name space did not have to be organized along the lines of network boundaries, name servers, etc. The rationale for this is not that the ...
... did not have to be organized along the lines of network boundaries, name servers, etc. The rationale for this is not that the name space should have no implied semantics, but rather that the choice of implied semantics ...
... However, there are some guidelines that apply to the "normal" parts of the name space used for hosts, mailboxes, etc., that will make the name space ...
... name space used for hosts, mailboxes, etc., that will make the name space more uniform, provide for growth, and minimize problems as software is converted from the older host table. The political ...
... Example name space ...
... is used in many examples in this RFC. Note that the tree is a very small subset of the actual name space. ...
... tree or hash structures for the name space, and chain RRs off nodes. The remaining ...


... database is partitioned in two ways: by class, and by "cuts" made in the name space between nodes. ...
... data format for existing types or a desire for a separately managed version of the existing name space. ...
... Within a class, "cuts" in the name space can be made between any two adjacent nodes. After all cuts are made, each group ...
... adjacent nodes. After all cuts are made, each group of connected name space is a separate zone. The zone is said to be authoritative for all names in the connected region. Note that the "cuts" in the name space ...
... group of connected name space is a separate zone. The zone is said to be authoritative for all names in the connected region. Note that the "cuts" in the name space may be in different places for different classes, the name servers may ...
... It would be possible, though not particularly useful, to partition the name space so that each domain name was in a separate zone or so that all nodes ...
... internal partitions to achieve nested delegations of name space control. In some cases, such divisions are made purely to make database ...


... Internet Name Domains", RFC-799, COMSAT, September 1981. Suggests introduction of a hierarchy in place of a flat name space for the Internet. ...



Google
Web
RFC-Ref