RFC 2008:Implications of Various Address Allocatio...
RFC-Ref

Internet


Click on the red underlined text to get to the source

... address allocation and management are essential operational functions for the Public Internet. The exact policies for IP unicast address ...
... unicast address allocation and management policies for the Public Internet, and to provide recommendations with respect to these policies. ...
... address ownership" and "address lending," and the technical implications of these policies for the Public Internet. For the organizations that could provide reachability to a sufficiently large ...
... reachability to a sufficiently large fraction of the total destinations in the Internet, and could express such reachability through a single IP address prefix ...
... "address ownership" policy to every individual site or organization that connects to the Internet results in a non-scalable routing. ...
... lending" policy should be formally added to the set of address allocation policies in the Public Internet. The document also recommends that organizations that do not provide a sufficient degree of routing information ...
... routing information aggregation, but wish to obtain access to the Internet routing services should be strongly encouraged to use this ...


... IP unicast address is its ability to interact with the Public Internet routing service and thereby ...
... routing service and thereby exchange data with the remainder of the Internet. In other words, for the Public Internet, it is the reachability ...
... exchange data with the remainder of the Internet. In other words, for the Public Internet, it is the reachability of an IP address that ...
... gives it an intrinsic value. Observe, however, that IP addresses are used outside of the Public Internet. This document does not cover the value of addresses in other than the Public Internet ...
... Public Internet. This document does not cover the value of addresses in other than the Public Internet context. ...
... The above implies that in the Public Internet it is the service environment (the Internet ...
... Public Internet it is the service environment (the Internet) and its continued operation, including its routing system, which gives an IP address ...
... routing system, which gives an IP address its intrinsic value, rather than the inverse. Consequently, if the Public Internet routing system ceases to be operational, the service ...
... service disappears, and the addresses cease to have any functional value in the Internet. At this point, for the Public Internet, all address ...
... cease to have any functional value in the Internet. At this point, for the Public Internet, all address allocation and management ...


... routing system. It is the only proven mechanism for scaling routing to the current size of the Internet. ...


... Scaling the Internet routing system ...
... The enormous growth of the Public Internet places a heavy load on the Internet routing system ...
... The enormous growth of the Public Internet places a heavy load on the Internet routing system. Before the introduction of CIDR the growth ...
... months. Even if we could double the capacities of the routers in the Internet every 24 months, inevitably the size of the routing tables is going to exceed the limit of the routers ...
... is going to exceed the limit of the routers. Therefore, to preserve uninterrupted continuous growth of the Public Internet, deploying mechanisms that contain the growth rate of the routing information is ...
... Lacking mechanisms to contain the growth rate of the routing information, the growth of the Internet would have to be either limited or frozen, or the Internet routing system ...
... routing information, the growth of the Internet would have to be either limited or frozen, or the Internet routing system would become overloaded ...
... RFC1518, RFC1519] has been deployed since late 1992 in the Public Internet as the primary mechanism to contain the growth rate of the routing information - ...
... routing information - without CIDR the Internet routing system would have already collapsed. For example, in October 1995, within AlterNet (one of the ...
... routing system would have already collapsed. For example, in October 1995, within AlterNet (one of the major Internet Service Providers) there were 3194 routes. Thanks to aggregation, AlterNet advertised only 799 routes to the rest of the ...
... aggregation, AlterNet advertised only 799 routes to the rest of the Internet - a saving of 2395 routes (75%) [Partan 95]. In October 1995 the Internet Routing Registry ...
... Internet - a saving of 2395 routes (75%) [Partan 95]. In October 1995 the Internet Routing Registry (IRR) contained 61,430 unique prefixes listed, not counting prefixes ...
... resulted in less than 30,000 routes in the default-free part of the Internet routing system [Villamizar 95]. ...
... CIDR is an example of the application of hierarchical routing in the Public Internet, where subnets, subscribers, and finally providers ...
... Because of pre-CIDR address allocation, many routes in the Internet are not suitable for hierarchical aggregation. Moreover, unconnected ...
... CIDR address allocations exist. If these sites connect to the Internet at some point in the future, the routes to these sites are unlikely to be suitable for hierarchical aggregation. Also, ...


... management policies yield scalable routing. The Internet routing system is subject to both technological and fundamental constraints ...
... The "address ownership" allocation policy and its implications on the Public Internet ...
... address ownership" policy, the organization would be able to use these addresses to gain access to the Internet routing services, ...
... routing services, regardless of where the organization connects to the Internet. ...
... While it has never been explicitly stated that various Internet Registries use the "address ownership" allocation policy, it has always been assumed (and practiced). ...
... ("portable" addresses) on the scalability of the Internet routing system, one must observe that: ...
... Specifically, the assignee is not required (but may be influenced) to relinquish the ownership as the connectivity of the assignee to the Internet changes. (b) By definition, hierarchical routing ...
... topology (or at least certain pieces of it) will be permanently fixed. Given the distributed, decentralized, largely unregulated, and global (international) nature of the Internet, constraining the Internet topology ...
... unregulated, and global (international) nature of the Internet, constraining the Internet topology (or even certain parts of it) may have broad technical, social, economical, and political implications. ...
... To date, little is known of what these implications are; even less is known whether these implications would be acceptable (feasible) in practice. Therefore, at least for now, we have to support an Internet with an unconstrained topology (and unconstrained topological ...
... Since the Internet does not constrain its topology (or allowed topology ...
... topology changes), we can either have address ownership for everyone or a routable Internet, but not both, or we need to develop and deploy new mechanisms (e.g., by decoupling the address owned by the ...
... deploy new mechanisms (e.g., by decoupling the address owned by the end users from those used by the Internet routing, and provide mechanisms to translate between the two). In the absence of new ...
... overhead will lead to a breakdown of the routing system resulting in a fragmented (partitioned) Internet. Alternately, we can have a routable Internet, but without address ...
... routing system resulting in a fragmented (partitioned) Internet. Alternately, we can have a routable Internet, but without address ownership ("portable" addresses ...
... The "address lending" allocation policy and its implications for the Public Internet ...
... This document expects that the "address lending" policy would be used primarily by Internet Registries associated with providers; however, this document does not preclude the use of the "address lending" ...
... this document does not preclude the use of the "address lending" policy by an Internet Registry that is not associated with a provider. ...
... This document expects that when the "address lending" policy is used by an Internet Registry associated with a provider, the provider is ...
... aggregation of these addresses to a degree that is sufficient to achieve Internet-wide IP connectivity. ...
... This document expects that when the "address lending" policy is used by an Internet Registry associated with a provider, the terms and conditions of the loan would be coupled to the service ...
... address prefix. This reduces the routing information that needs to be carried by the Internet routing system (for more information, see Section 5.3.1 of RFC1518hist ...
... appropriately, could play an important role in enabling the continuous uninterrupted growth of the Internet. ...
... Organizations connecting to the Internet should be aware that even if their current provider, and the provider ...
... switch to in the future do not require renumbering, renumbering may still be needed to achieve Internet-wide IP connectivity. For example, an organization may now receive Internet service ...
... Internet-wide IP connectivity. For example, an organization may now receive Internet service from some provider and allocate its addresses ...
... prefix (that covers destinations within the organization) to the rest of the Internet. However, if one or more other providers exist, that are unwilling or unable to accept the longer prefix ...
... then the organization would not have IP connectivity to part of the Internet. Among the possible solutions open to the organization may be either to renumber, or for others to acquire connectivity to providers that are willing and able to accept the prefix ...


... Observe that the goal of hierarchical routing in the Internet is not to reduce the total amount of routing information in the Internet ...
... Internet is not to reduce the total amount of routing information in the Internet to the theoretically possible minimum, but just to contain the volume of routing information ...
... reachability to a sufficiently large fraction of the total destinations in the Internet and could express such reachability through a single IP address prefix ...
... prefix will be maintained throughout the default-free part of the Internet routing system, regardless of where they connect to the Internet ...
... Internet routing system, regardless of where they connect to the Internet. Therefore, using the "address ownership" policy when allocating addresses ...
... For all other organizations that expect Internet-wide IP connectivity, the reachability ...
... connectivity, the reachability information they inject into the Internet routing system should be subject to hierarchical ...
... aggregation difficult, if not impossible. This, in turn, has a very detrimental effect on the Internet routing system. To prevent the collapse of the Internet ...
... Internet routing system. To prevent the collapse of the Internet routing system, for such organizations, this document recommends using the "address ...
... recommends using the "address lending" policy. Consequently, when such an organization first connects to the Public Internet or changes its topological attachment to the Public Internet, the organization ...
... such an organization first connects to the Public Internet or changes its topological attachment to the Public Internet, the organization eventually needs to renumber. Renumbering allows the organization to withdraw any exceptional prefixes ...
... withdraw any exceptional prefixes that the organization would otherwise inject into the Internet routing system. This applies to the case where the organization takes its addresses ...
... address ownership," nor the "address lending" policy, by itself, is sufficient to guarantee Internet-wide IP connectivity. Therefore, we recommend that sites with addresses ...
... If an organization doesn't require Internet-wide IP connectivity, then address ...
... routing information to its direct provider. Connectivity to the rest of the Internet can be handled by mediating gateways (e.g., application layer ...
... that use of mediating gateways eliminates the need for renumbering, and avoids burdening the Internet routing system with non- aggregatable addressing ...


... management policy for IP addresses used for Internet connectivity must take into account its impact on the scalability of the Public Internet ...
... Internet connectivity must take into account its impact on the scalability of the Public Internet routing system. Among all of the possible address ...
... routing system are feasible. All other policies are self-destructive in nature, as they lead to a collapse of the Internet routing system, and therefore to the fragmentation ...
... routing system, and therefore to the fragmentation (partitioning) of the Public Internet. ...
... Within the context of the current Public Internet, address allocation and management ...
... address ownership have an extremely negative impact on the scalability of the Internet routing system. Such policies are almost certain to exhaust the ...
... routing system. Such policies are almost certain to exhaust the scalability of the Internet routing system well before we approach the exhaustion of the IPv4 address ...
... IPv4 address space and before we can make effective use of the IPv6 address space. Given the Internet's growth rate and current technology, the notion that everyone can own address space and receive Internet-wide ...
... Internet's growth rate and current technology, the notion that everyone can own address space and receive Internet-wide routing services, despite where they ...
... routing services, despite where they connect to the Internet, is currently technically infeasible. Therefore, this document makes two recommendations. First, the "address ...
... address lending" policy should be formally added to the set of address allocation policies in the Public Internet. Second, organizations that do not provide a sufficient degree of routing information aggregation ...
... organizations that do not provide a sufficient degree of routing information aggregation to obtain access to the Internet routing services ...


... access control from external networks, such as The Internet, to their internal systems. Such firewalls might include access control ...



Google
Web
RFC-Ref