RFC 2623:NFS Version 2 and Version 3 Security Issu...
RFC-Ref

1. Introduction

The NFS protocol provides transparent remote access to shared file systems across networks. The NFS protocol is designed to be machine, operating system, network architecture, and security mechanism, and transport protocol independent. This independence is achieved through the use of ONC Remote Procedure Call (RPC) primitives built on top of an eXternal Data Representation (XDR). NFS protocol Version 2 is specified in the Network File System Protocol Specification [RFC1094]. A description of the initial implementation can be found in [Sandberg]. NFS protocol Version 3 is specified in the NFS Version 3 Protocol Specification [RFC1813]. A description of some initial implementations can be found in [Pawlowski].

For the remainder of this document, whenever it refers to the NFS protocol, it means NFS Version 2 and Version 3, unless otherwise stated.

The RPC protocol is specified in the Remote Procedure Call Protocol Specification Version 2 [RFC1831]. The XDR protocol is specified in External Data Representation Standard [RFC1832].

A new RPC security flavor, RPCSEC_GSS, has been specified [RFC2203]. This new flavor allows application protocols built on top of RPC to access security mechanisms that adhere to the GSS-API specification [RFC2078].

The purpose of this document is to clarify NFS security issues and to specify how the NFS protocol uses RPCSEC_GSS. This document will also describe how NFS works over Kerberos V5, via RPCSEC_GSS.

The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].

1.1. Overview of RPC Security Architecture

The RPC protocol includes a slot for security parameters (referred to as an authentication flavor in the RPC specification [RFC1831]) on every call. The contents of the security parameters are determined by the type of authentication used by the server and client. A server may support several different flavors of authentication at once. Some of the better known flavors are summarized as follows:

The NFS protocol is not limited to the above list of security flavors.


Google
Web
RFC-Ref