RFC 3160:The Tao of IETF - A Novice's Guide to the...
RFC-Ref

BCP


Click on the red underlined text to get to the source

... without having some sort of structure. In the IETF's case, that structure is provided by other organizations, as described in BCP 11 (RFC-2028), "The Organizations Involved in the IETF Standards ...
... IETF Standards Process." If you participate in the IETF and only read one BCP, this is the one you should read. ...
... appointed for two years. The process for choosing the members of the IESG is detailed in BCP 10(RFC-2727(-> 3777)), "IAB and IESG ...


... WGs. (The term "Working Group" is often seen capitalized, but probably not for a very good reason.) BCP 25(RFC-2418), "IETF Working Group ...
... The role of the WG chairs is described in both BCP 11(RFC-2028) and BCP 25(RFC-2418 ...
... WG chairs is described in both BCP 11(RFC-2028) and BCP 25(RFC-2418). Basically, their job is to keep the discussion ...


... A much more complete explanation of these steps is contained in BCP 9(RFC-2026), "The Internet Standards Process ...
... Internet Standards Process." Anyone who writes a draft that they hope will become an IETF standard must read BCP 9(RFC-2026) so that they can follow the path of their document through the process. BCP ...
... BCP 9(RFC-2026) so that they can follow the path of their document through the process. BCP 9(RFC-2026) goes into great detail on a topic that is very often misunderstood, ...
... There are also three sub-series of RFCs, known as FYIs, BCPs, and STDs. The For Your Information RFC sub-series was created ...
... removed from the online directories after six months. They are most definitely not standards or even specifications. As BCP 9(RFC-2026) says: ...
... BCP 22 (RFC-2365), "Guide for Internet Standards Writers," provides tips ...
... The procedure for creating and advancing a standard is described in BCP 9(RFC-2026). After an Internet Draft has been sufficiently discussed and ...
... last call. If the draft is an individual submission, the draft's author or editor submits it to the appropriate Area Director. BCP 9(RFC-2026) also describes the appeals process for people who feel that a Working Group ...
... Support," written way back in 1989, had a short list of words that had appeared to be useful, namely "must", "should", and "may". These definitions were updated and further refined in BCP 14(RFC-2119), "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels ...
... Requirement Levels," which is widely referenced in current Internet standards. BCP 14(RFC-2119) also specifically defines "must not" and "should not", and lists a few synonyms for the ...
... In a standard, in order to make it clear that you're using the definitions from BCP 14(RFC-2119), you should do two things. First, refer to BCP ...
... BCP 14(RFC-2119), you should do two things. First, refer to BCP 14 (although most people refer to it as RFC 2119, because that's what BCP ...
... BCP 14 (although most people refer to it as RFC 2119, because that's what BCP 14 tells you to do), so that the reader knows how you're defining your words. Second, you should point out which instances of the words you are using come from BCP ...
... BCP 14 tells you to do), so that the reader knows how you're defining your words. Second, you should point out which instances of the words you are using come from BCP 14. The accepted practice for this is to capitalize the words. That is why you see "MUST" and "SHOULD" capitalized in IETF standards ...
... BCP 14 is a short document, and should be read by everyone who is reading or writing IETF standards. Although the definitions of ...
... Internet standard that may need an IANA registry needs to read BCP 26 (RFC-2434), "Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations ...
... IANA also maintains registries that were started long before BCP 26 was produced. ...
... methods for dealing with patents in standards are a subject of much debate. You can read about the official rules in BCP 9(RFC-2026), but you should assume that the application of those rules is ...
... IPR can change at any time. Therefore, an IPR list in a RFC could be incomplete and mislead the reader. BCP 9(RFC-2026) provides specific text that should be added to RFCs where the author knows of ...


... AD Area Director BCP Best Current Practice BOF ...
... BCP 9 "The Internet Standards Process" (RFC-2026 ...
... (RFC-2026) BCP 10 "IAB and IESG Selection, Confirmation, and Recall Process ...
... 2727(-> 3777)) Operation of the Nominating and Recall Committees" BCP 11 "The Organizations Involved in the IETF Standards Process" (RFC-2028 ...
... (RFC-2028) BCP 14 "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels" (RFC-2119 ...
... (RFC-2119) BCP 22 "Guide for Internet Standards Writers" (RFC-2360 ...
... (RFC-2360) BCP 25 "IETF Working Group Guidelines and Procedures" (RFC-2418 ...
... (RFC-2418) BCP 26 "Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section (RFC-2434 ...



Google
Web
RFC-Ref