RFC 3261:SIP: Session Initiation Protocol
RFC-Ref

Route


Click on the red underlined text to get to the source

... Contact contains a SIP or SIPS URI that represents a direct route to contact Alice, usually composed of a username at a fully qualified domain name ...
... INVITE has been received and that the proxy is working on her behalf to route the INVITE to the destination ...
... service lookups were required to route the initial INVITE, the 180 (Ringing) response can be returned to the caller ...
... INVITE a required routing header field known as Record- Route that contained a URI resolving to the hostname or IP address of ...
... proxy. This information would be received by both Bob's SIP phone and (due to the Record-Route header field being passed back in the 200 (OK)) Alice's softphone and stored for the duration of the dialog. The biloxi.com proxy server ...


... routing if it follows the procedures defined in this specification for processing of the Route header field. These procedures separate the destination ...
... the set of proxies that need to be visited along the way (present in the Route header field). A proxy compliant to ...
... alerted (ringing). Route Set: A route set is a collection of ordered SIP or SIPS URI ...
... Route Set: A route set is a collection of ordered SIP or SIPS URI ...
... which represent a list of proxies that must be traversed when sending a particular request. A route set can be learned, through headers like Record-Route ...
... route set can be learned, through headers like Record-Route, or it can be configured. Server: A server is a network element ...
... proxy is said to be strict routing if it follows the Route processing rules of RFC 2543(-> 3265prop | 3264prop | 3263prop | 3262prop | 3261prop) and many prior work in progress ...
... proxies to destroy the contents of the Request-URI when a Route header field was present. Strict routing behavior is not used in this ...


... header fields which are needed for proxy processing (Via, Route, Record-Route, Proxy-Require, ...
... needed for proxy processing (Via, Route, Record-Route, Proxy-Require, Max-Forwards, and Proxy ...
... valid and equivalent: Route: <sip:alice@atlanta.com> Subject: Lunch ...
... Subject: Lunch Route: <sip:bob@biloxi.com> Route: <sip:carol@chicago.com> ...
... Route: <sip:bob@biloxi.com> Route: <sip:carol@chicago.com> Route ...
... Route: <sip:carol@chicago.com> Route: <sip:alice@atlanta.com>, <sip:bob@biloxi.com> Route: <sip:carol@chicago.com> ...
... Route: <sip:alice@atlanta.com>, <sip:bob@biloxi.com> Route: <sip:carol@chicago.com> Subject: Lunch ...
... Subject: Lunch Route: <sip:alice@atlanta.com>, <sip:bob@biloxi.com>, <sip:carol@chicago.com> ...
... others: Route: <sip:alice@atlanta.com> Route: <sip:bob@biloxi.com> ...
... Route: <sip:alice@atlanta.com> Route: <sip:bob@biloxi.com> Route: <sip:carol@chicago.com> ...
... Route: <sip:bob@biloxi.com> Route: <sip:carol@chicago.com> Route ...
... Route: <sip:carol@chicago.com> Route: <sip:bob@biloxi.com> Route: <sip:alice@atlanta.com> ...
... Route: <sip:bob@biloxi.com> Route: <sip:alice@atlanta.com> Route: <sip:carol@chicago.com> ...
... Route: <sip:alice@atlanta.com> Route: <sip:carol@chicago.com> Route ...
... Route: <sip:carol@chicago.com> Route: <sip:alice@atlanta.com>,<sip:carol@chicago.com>, <sip:bob@biloxi.com> ...


... transit). In some special circumstances, the presence of a pre-existing route set can affect the Request-URI of the message. A pre-existing route ...
... route set can affect the Request-URI of the message. A pre-existing route set is an ordered set of URIs that identify a chain of servers, to ...
... UA with an outbound proxy, it is RECOMMENDED that this be done by providing it with a pre-existing route set with a single URI, that of the outbound proxy ...
... outbound proxy. When a pre-existing route set is present, the procedures for populating the Request-URI and Route ...
... route set is present, the procedures for populating the Request-URI and Route header field detailed in Section 12.2.1.1 MUST be followed (even though there is no dialog), using the ...
... If the Request-URI or top Route header field value contains a SIPS URI, the Contact header field ...
... 4] as follows. If the first element in the route set indicated a strict router (resulting in forming the request as described in Section 12.2.1.1), the ...
... procedures MUST be applied to the Request-URI of the request. Otherwise, the procedures are applied to the first Route header field value in the request (if one exists), or to the request's Request-URI ...
... value in the request (if one exists), or to the request's Request-URI if there is no Route header field present. These procedures yield an ordered set of address ...
... TLS. Beyond that, there are no restrictions on the alternate destinations if the request contains no Route header field. This provides a simple alternative to a pre-existing route ...
... destinations if the request contains no Route header field. This provides a simple alternative to a pre-existing route set as a way to specify an outbound proxy. However, that approach ...
... for configuring an outbound proxy is NOT RECOMMENDED; a pre-existing route set with a single URI SHOULD be used instead. If the request contains a Route ...
... route set with a single URI SHOULD be used instead. If the request contains a Route header field, the request SHOULD be sent to the locations derived from its topmost value, but MAY be sent to any ...
... locations derived from its topmost value, but MAY be sent to any server that the UA is certain will honor the Route and Request-URI policies specified in this document (as opposed to those in RFC ...
... attempt to send the request to the location indicated in the first Route header field value instead of adopting the policy of sending all messages to the outbound proxy ...
... This ensures that outbound proxies that do not add Record-Route header field values will drop out of the path of subsequent requests. It allows endpoints that cannot resolve the first Route ...
... Record-Route header field values will drop out of the path of subsequent requests. It allows endpoints that cannot resolve the first Route URI to delegate that task to an outbound proxy ...


... transaction in its own right (See Section 17). If the request being cancelled contains a Route header field, the CANCEL request MUST include that Route ...
... Route header field, the CANCEL request MUST include that Route header field's values. ...
... This is needed so that stateless proxies are able to route CANCEL requests properly. ...


... REGISTER request does not establish a dialog. A UAC MAY include a Route header field in a REGISTER request based on a pre-existing ...
... header field in a REGISTER request based on a pre-existing route set as described in Section 8.1. The Record-Route header field has no meaning in REGISTER ...
... REGISTER request based on a pre-existing route set as described in Section 8.1. The Record-Route header field has no meaning in REGISTER requests or responses, and MUST be ignored ...
... if present. In particular, the UAC MUST NOT create a new route set based on the presence or absence of a Record-Route ...
... route set based on the presence or absence of a Record-Route header field in any response to a REGISTER ...
... proxy server in the chicago.com domain to route requests for Carol's address-of-record to her SIP endpoint. ...
... interface with a 302 (Moved Temporarily) response. Registrars MUST ignore the Record-Route header field if it is included in a REGISTER request. Registrars MUST NOT include a Record ...
... included in a REGISTER request. Registrars MUST NOT include a Record-Route header field in any response to a REGISTER request. ...
... REGISTER as an unknown request and which added a Record- Route header field value. ...


... URI, remote target, a boolean flag called "secure", and a route set, which is an ordered list of URIs. The route ...
... route set, which is an ordered list of URIs. The route set is the list of servers that need to be traversed to send a request to the peer. A dialog can also be in the "early" state ...
... dialog (such as a 2xx to INVITE), the UAS MUST copy all Record-Route header field values from the request into the response (including the URIs, URI parameters ...
... URIs, URI parameters, and any Record-Route header field parameters, whether they are known or unknown to the UAS) and MUST maintain the ...
... SIPS URI in the Request-URI or in the top Record-Route header field value, if there was any, or the Contact header field if there was no ...
... value, if there was any, or the Contact header field if there was no Record-Route header field, the Contact header field in the response MUST be a SIPS URI ...
... SIPS URI, the "secure" flag is set to TRUE. The route set MUST be set to the list of URIs in the Record-Route header field from the request, taken in order and preserving all URI parameters ...
... The route set MUST be set to the list of URIs in the Record-Route header field from the request, taken in order and preserving all URI parameters. If no Record-Route header field is present in the ...
... URIs in the Record-Route header field from the request, taken in order and preserving all URI parameters. If no Record-Route header field is present in the request, the route set MUST be set to the empty set. This route ...
... URI parameters. If no Record-Route header field is present in the request, the route set MUST be set to the empty set. This route set, even if empty, overrides any pre-existing route ...
... Record-Route header field is present in the request, the route set MUST be set to the empty set. This route set, even if empty, overrides any pre-existing route set for future ...
... route set MUST be set to the empty set. This route set, even if empty, overrides any pre-existing route set for future requests in this dialog. The remote target MUST be set to the URI ...
... header field of the request. If the request has a Request- URI or a topmost Route header field value with a SIPS URI, the ...
... SIPS URI, the "secure" flag is set to TRUE. The route set MUST be set to the list of URIs in the Record-Route header field from the response, taken in reverse order and preserving ...
... The route set MUST be set to the list of URIs in the Record-Route header field from the response, taken in reverse order and preserving all URI parameters. If no Record-Route header field ...
... Record-Route header field from the response, taken in reverse order and preserving all URI parameters. If no Record-Route header field is present in the response, the route set MUST be set to the empty set. This route ...
... URI parameters. If no Record-Route header field is present in the response, the route set MUST be set to the empty set. This route set, even if empty, overrides any pre-existing route ...
... Record-Route header field is present in the response, the route set MUST be set to the empty set. This route set, even if empty, overrides any pre-existing route set for future ...
... route set MUST be set to the empty set. This route set, even if empty, overrides any pre-existing route set for future requests in this dialog. The remote target MUST be set to the URI ...
... established the dialog. Requests within a dialog MAY contain Record-Route and Contact header fields. However, these requests do not cause the dialog's route set ...
... Requests within a dialog MAY contain Record-Route and Contact header fields. However, these requests do not cause the dialog's route set to be modified, although they may modify the remote target URI ...
... target URI, and not the route set formed from the Record-Route. Updating the latter would introduce severe backwards compatibility ...
... URI, and not the route set formed from the Record-Route. Updating the latter would introduce severe backwards compatibility problems with ...
... The UAC uses the remote target and route set to build the Request-URI and Route ...
... route set to build the Request-URI and Route header field of the request. ...
... header field of the request. If the route set is empty, the UAC MUST place the remote target URI ...
... into the Request-URI. The UAC MUST NOT add a Route header field to the request. ...
... the request. If the route set is not empty, and the first URI in the route set ...
... If the route set is not empty, and the first URI in the route set contains the lr parameter (see Section 19.1.1), the UAC MUST place ...
... target URI into the Request-URI and MUST include a Route header field containing the route ...
... Route header field containing the route set values in order, including all parameters. ...
... parameters. If the route set is not empty, and its first URI does not contain the lr parameter, the UAC ...
... lr parameter, the UAC MUST place the first URI from the route set into the Request-URI, stripping any parameters that are not allowed ...
... in a Request-URI. The UAC MUST add a Route header field containing the remainder of the route ...
... Route header field containing the remainder of the route set values in order, including all parameters. The UAC MUST then place the remote target ...
... target URI into the Route header field as the last value. ...
... For example, if the remote target is sip:user@remoteua and the route set contains: ...
... The request will be formed with the following Request-URI and Route header field: ...
... METHOD sip:proxy1 Route: <sip:proxy2>,<sip:proxy3;lr>,<sip:proxy4>,<sip:user@remoteua> If the first URI ...
... If the first URI of the route set does not contain the lr parameter, the proxy indicated does not understand the routing ...
... RFC 2543(-> 3265prop | 3264prop | 3263prop | 3262prop | 3261prop), replacing the Request-URI with the first Route header field value it receives while forwarding the message. Placing the Request-URI ...
... header field value it receives while forwarding the message. Placing the Request-URI at the end of the Route header field preserves the ...
... The procedures in Section 8.1.2 will normally result in the request being sent to the address indicated by the topmost Route header field value or the Request-URI ...
... header field value or the Request-URI if no Route header field is present. Subject ...
... to be sent to an alternate address (such as a default outbound proxy not represented in the route set). ...
... Note, however, that when the UAC tries alternative locations, it still uses the route set for the dialog to build the Route header ...
... UAC tries alternative locations, it still uses the route set for the dialog to build the Route header of the request. ...
... increasing CSeq sequence numbers even across reboots, reconstructing the route set, and accepting out-of-range RTP timestamps ...


... identifier of an existing dialog, the dialog MUST be transitioned to the "confirmed" state, and the route set for the dialog MUST be recomputed based on the 2xx response using the procedures of Section 12.2.1.2. Otherwise, a new dialog in the "confirmed" state ...
... Note that the only piece of state that is recomputed is the route set. Other pieces of state such as the highest sequence numbers ...
... sequence numbers (remote and local) sent within the dialog are not recomputed. The route set only is recomputed for backwards compatibility. RFC 2543(-> 3265prop | 3264prop | 3263prop | 3262prop | 3261prop) ...
... backwards compatibility. RFC 2543(-> 3265prop | 3264prop | 3263prop | 3262prop | 3261prop) did not mandate mirroring of the Record-Route header field in a 1xx, only 2xx. However, we cannot update the entire state ...


... SIP proxies are elements that route SIP requests to user agent servers and SIP ...
... decisions, modifying the request before forwarding it to the next element. Responses will route through the same set of proxies traversed by the request in the reverse order. ...
... proxy core. The proxy core determines where to route the request, choosing one or more next-hop locations. An outgoing request for ...
... Route Information Preprocessing ...
... proxy previously placed into a Record-Route header field (see Section 16.6 item 4), the proxy ...
... proxy MUST replace the Request-URI in the request with the last value from the Route header field, and remove that value from the ...
... header field, and remove that value from the Route header field. The proxy MUST then proceed as if it received ...
... state in order to detect URIs it previously placed in Record-Route header fields. Instead, a proxy ...
... transport. If the first value in the Route header field indicates this proxy, ...
... expressed as a SIP or SIPS URI, is inserted as the top-most Route header field value into the request. ...
... 4. Optionally add a Record-route header field value ...
... in a request. 4. Record-Route If this proxy ...
... creates a dialog), it MUST insert a Record-Route header field value into the copy before any existing Record-Route header field ...
... Route header field value into the copy before any existing Record-Route header field values, even if a Route header field is already present. ...
... header field value into the copy before any existing Record-Route header field values, even if a Route header field is already present. ...
... header field is already present. Requests establishing a dialog may contain a preloaded Route header field. ...
... proxy SHOULD insert a Record-Route header field value if it wishes to remain on the path of future requests in the dialog. In normal ...
... endpoint operation as described in Section 12, these Record- Route header field values will not have any effect on the route ...
... Route header field values will not have any effect on the route sets used by the endpoints. ...
... The proxy will remain on the path if it chooses to not insert a Record-Route header field value into requests that are already part of a dialog. However, it would be removed ...
... A proxy MAY insert a Record-Route header field value into any request. If the request does not initiate a dialog, the ...
... endpoints will ignore the value. See Section 12 for details on how endpoints use the Record-Route header field values to construct Route header fields ...
... endpoints use the Record-Route header field values to construct Route header fields. ...
... Each proxy in the path of a request chooses whether to add a Record-Route header field value independently - the presence of a Record ...
... header field value independently - the presence of a Record-Route header field in a request does not obligate this proxy ...
... The URI placed in the Record-Route header field value MUST be a SIP or SIPS URI ...
... The URI placed in the Record-Route header field MUST resolve to the element inserting it (or a suitable stand-in) when the ...
... Request-URI contains a SIPS URI, or the topmost Route header field value (after the post processing of bullet 6) contains a SIPS URI ...
... SIPS URI, the URI placed into the Record-Route header field MUST be a SIPS URI. Furthermore, if the request was not ...
... TLS, the proxy MUST insert a Record-Route header field. In a similar fashion, a proxy that receives a request ...
... SIPS URI in the Request-URI or topmost Route header field value (after the post processing of bullet 6), MUST insert a Record ...
... header field value (after the post processing of bullet 6), MUST insert a Record-Route header field that is not a SIPS URI. ...
... If the URI placed in the Record-Route header field needs to be rewritten when it passes back through in a response, the URI ...
... may spiral through this proxy, resulting in more than one Record-Route header field value being added). Item 8 of Section 16.7 recommends a mechanism to make the URI ...
... The proxy MAY include parameters in the Record-Route header field value. These will be echoed in some responses to the request such as the 200 (OK) responses to INVITE. Such ...
... as one straddling a firewall), it SHOULD add a Record-Route header field value to every request with a method ...
... URI a proxy places into a Record-Route header field is only valid ...
... Endpoints MUST NOT use a URI obtained from a Record-Route header field outside the dialog in which it was provided. See ...
... Section 12 for more information on an endpoint's use of Record-Route header fields. ...
... scalability and thus proxies should only record-route if required for a particular service. ...
... service. The Record-Route process is designed to work for any SIP request that initiates a dialog. INVITE is the only such ...
... URIs (each of which contains the lr parameter). This set MUST be pushed into the Route header field of the copy ahead of any existing values, if present. If the Route ...
... Route header field of the copy ahead of any existing values, if present. If the Route header field is absent, it MUST be added, containing that list of URIs ...
... proxy has a local policy that mandates that the request visit one specific proxy, an alternative to pushing a Route value into the Route header field ...
... proxy, an alternative to pushing a Route value into the Route header field is to bypass the forwarding ...
... transport for that specific proxy. If the request has a Route header field, this alternative MUST NOT be used unless it is known that next hop ...
... proxy is a loose router. Otherwise, this approach MAY be used, but the Route insertion mechanism above is preferred for its robustness, flexibility, generality and consistency ...
... proxy. If the copy contains a Route header field, the proxy MUST ...
... - The proxy MUST place the Request-URI into the Route header field as the last value. ...
... - The proxy MUST then place the first Route header field value into the Request-URI ...
... into the Request-URI and remove that value from the Route header field. ...
... Appending the Request-URI to the Route header field is part of a mechanism used to pass the information in that Request-URI ...
... through strict-routing elements. "Popping" the first Route header field value into the Request-URI ...
... URI in the Request-URI and the next location to visit in the first Route header field value). ...
... port, and transport, independent of the values of the Route and Request-URI. Such a policy MUST NOT be used if the proxy ...
... However, this mechanism for sending the request through a specific next hop is NOT RECOMMENDED; instead a Route header field should be used for that purpose as described above. ...
... Request-URI of the request. Otherwise, the proxy MUST apply the procedures to the first value in the Route header field, if present, else the Request-URI ...
... processing of the request have not changed. The value placed in this part of the branch parameter SHOULD reflect all of those fields (including any Route, Proxy-Require and Proxy- ...
... header field values if necessary 8. Optionally rewrite Record-Route header field values 9. Forward the response ...
... Authorization Header Field Values" through "Record-Route". This step, combined with the next, ensures that a stateful ...
... Authorization Header Field Values" through "Record- Route". For example, if a proxy ...
... Motivation for this behavior is provided in Section 26. 8. Record-Route If the selected response contains a Record ...
... If the selected response contains a Record-Route header field value originally provided by this proxy ...
... proxy MUST rewrite the URI in the Record-Route header field to be a SIPS URI. If the proxy ...
... TLS, the proxy MUST rewrite the URI in the Record-Route header field to be a SIP URI. ...
... constraints on URIs placed in Record-Route header fields in requests (see Step 4 of Section 16.6) with the following ...
... When a proxy does decide to modify the Record-Route header field in the response, one of the operations it performs is locating the Record-Route value that it had inserted. If the ...
... proxy does decide to modify the Record-Route header field in the response, one of the operations it performs is locating the Record-Route value that it had inserted. If the request spiraled, and the proxy inserted a Record ...
... request spiraled, and the proxy inserted a Record-Route value in each iteration of the spiral, locating the correct value in the response (which must be the proper iteration in the reverse ...
... direction) is tricky. The rules above recommend that a proxy wishing to rewrite Record-Route header field values insert sufficiently distinct URIs into the Record-Route header field ...
... Record-Route header field values insert sufficiently distinct URIs into the Record-Route header field so that the right one may be selected for rewriting. A RECOMMENDED mechanism to achieve this is for the proxy ...
... When the response arrives, the proxy modifies the first Record-Route whose identifier matches the proxy instance. The ...
... URI. Upon the next iteration, the same algorithm (find the topmost Record-Route header field value with the parameter) will correctly extract the next Record-Route header field value inserted by that ...
... algorithm (find the topmost Record-Route header field value with the parameter) will correctly extract the next Record-Route header field value inserted by that proxy. ...
... Not every response to a request to which a proxy adds a Record-Route header field value will contain a Record-Route ...
... Route header field value will contain a Record-Route header field. If the response does contain a Record ...
... header field. If the response does contain a Record-Route header field, it will contain the value the proxy ...
... Authorization Header Field Values" through "Record-Route", the proxy MAY perform any feature specific manipulations on the ...
... request. In particular, if the proxy inserts a Record-Route value or pushes URIs into the Route ...
... Route value or pushes URIs into the Route header field, it MUST place the same values in retransmissions ...
... requests. In particular, a stateless proxy applies the same Route header field processing to CANCEL requests that it applies to any ...
... Summary of Proxy Route Processing ...
... In the absence of local policy to the contrary, the processing a proxy performs on a request containing a Route header field can be summarized in the following steps. ...
... 2. The proxy will inspect the URI in the topmost Route header field value. If it indicates this proxy, the proxy ...
... proxy removes it from the Route header field (this route node ...
... from the Route header field (this route node has been reached). ...
... proxy will forward the request to the resource indicated by the URI in the topmost Route header field value or in the Request-URI ...
... header field value or in the Request-URI if no Route header field is present. The proxy determines the address ...
... DNS and sends it there. It also adds a Record-Route header field value: ...
... Contact: sip:caller@u1.example.com Record-Route: <sip:p1.example.com;lr> P2 gets this. It is responsible for domain ...
... service and rewrites the Request-URI. It also adds a Record-Route header field value. There is no Route ...
... Route header field value. There is no Route header field, so it resolves the new Request-URI ...
... Contact: sip:caller@u1.example.com Record-Route: <sip:p2.domain.com;lr> Record-Route ...
... Record-Route: <sip:p2.domain.com;lr> Record-Route: <sip:p1.example.com;lr> The callee at u2.domain ...
... Contact: sip:callee@u2.domain.com Record-Route: <sip:p2.domain.com;lr> Record-Route ...
... Record-Route: <sip:p2.domain.com;lr> Record-Route: <sip:p1.example.com;lr> The callee at u2 also sets its dialog state ...
... URI to sip:caller@u1.example.com and its route set to: (<sip:p2.domain ...
... URI to sip:callee@u2.domain.com and its route set to: (<sip:p1.example.com;lr>,<sip:p2.domain ...
... domain.com;lr>) Since all the route set elements contain the lr parameter, U1 constructs the following BYE request: ...
... domain.com SIP/2.0 Route: <sip:p1.example.com;lr>,<sip:p2.domain.com;lr> ...
... proxies) would do, it resolves the URI in the topmost Route header field value using DNS to determine ...
... Request-URI so it doesn't change it. It does see that it is the first value in the Route header field, so it removes that value, and forwards the ...
... domain.com SIP/2.0 Route: <sip:p2.domain.com;lr> ...
... u2.domain.com), so it doesn't change it. It does see itself in the first Route header field value, so it removes it and forwards the ...
... In this scenario, a dialog is established across four proxies, each of which adds Record-Route header field values. The third proxy implements the strict-routing ...
... Contact: sip:caller@u1.example.com Record-Route: <sip:p4.domain.com;lr> Record-Route ...
... Record-Route: <sip:p4.domain.com;lr> Record-Route: <sip:p3.middle.com> Record-Route: <sip:p2.example.com;lr> ...
... Record-Route: <sip:p3.middle.com> Record-Route: <sip:p2.example.com;lr> Record-Route: <sip:p1.example.com;lr> ...
... Record-Route: <sip:p2.example.com;lr> Record-Route: <sip:p1.example.com;lr> Which U2 responds to with a 200 OK. Later, U2 sends the following ...
... Which U2 responds to with a 200 OK. Later, U2 sends the following BYE request to P4 based on the first Route header field value. ...
... caller@u1.example.com SIP/2.0 Route: <sip:p4.domain.com;lr> Route ...
... Route: <sip:p4.domain.com;lr> Route: <sip:p3.middle.com> Route: <sip:p2.example.com;lr> ...
... Route: <sip:p3.middle.com> Route: <sip:p2.example.com;lr> Route: <sip:p1.example.com;lr> ...
... Route: <sip:p2.example.com;lr> Route: <sip:p1.example.com;lr> P4 is not responsible for the resource indicated in the Request-URI ...
... so it will leave it alone. It notices that it is the element in the first Route header field value so it removes it. It then prepares to ...
... header field value so it removes it. It then prepares to send the request based on the now first Route header field value of sip:p3.middle.com, but it notices that this URI ...
... BYE sip:p3.middle.com SIP/2.0 Route: <sip:p2.example.com;lr> Route: <sip:p1.example.com;lr> ...
... Route: <sip:p2.example.com;lr> Route: <sip:p1.example.com;lr> Route: <sip:caller ...
... Route: <sip:p1.example.com;lr> Route: <sip:caller@u1.example.com> ...
... BYE sip:p2.example.com;lr SIP/2.0 Route: <sip:p1.example.com;lr> Route: <sip:caller ...
... Route: <sip:p1.example.com;lr> Route: <sip:caller@u1.example.com> ...
... P2 sees the request-URI is a value it placed into a Record-Route header field, so before further processing, it rewrites the request ...
... caller@u1.example.com SIP/2.0 Route: <sip:p1.example.com;lr> P2 is not responsible for u1.example.com, so it sends the request to ...
... P2 is not responsible for u1.example.com, so it sends the request to P1 based on the resolution of the Route header field value. ...
... header field value. P1 notices itself in the topmost Route header field value, so it removes ...
... SIP/2.0 Since P1 is not responsible for u1.example.com and there is no Route header field, P1 will forward the request to u1.example.com based on ...
... Rewriting Record-Route Header Field Values ...
... Contact: <sip:caller@u1.leftprivatespace.com> Record-Route: <sip:gateway.rightprivatespace.com;lr> ...
... SIP/2.0 200 OK Contact: <sip:callee@u2.rightprivatespace.com> Record-Route: <sip:gateway.rightprivatespace.com;lr> ...
... gateway.rightprivatespace.com;lr> P1 rewrites its Record-Route header parameter to provide a value that U1 will find useful, and sends the following to U1: ...
... SIP/2.0 200 OK Contact: <sip:callee@u2.rightprivatespace.com> Record-Route: <sip:gateway.leftprivatespace.com;lr> ...
... BYE sip:callee@u2.rightprivatespace.com SIP/2.0 Route: <sip:gateway.leftprivatespace.com;lr> ...


... If the INVITE request whose response is being acknowledged had Route header fields, those header fields ...


... accommodates the fact that the response in SIP can be larger than the request. This happens due to the addition of Record-Route header field values to the responses to INVITE, for example. With the extra buffer ...
... REGISTER request or a redirect response, or in a Record-Route header field in a request or response. A URI ...


... URI to specify a proxy that must be traversed en-route to the destination. Continuing to use the maddr parameter this way is strongly discouraged (the ...
... maddr parameter this way is strongly discouraged (the mechanisms that enable it are deprecated). Implementations should instead use the Route mechanism described in this document, establishing a pre-existing route set if necessary ...
... should instead use the Route mechanism described in this document, establishing a pre-existing route set if necessary (see Section 8.1.1.1). This provides a full URI to describe ...
... URIs proxies place into Record-Route header field values, and may appear in the URIs in a pre-existing route ...
... Record-Route header field values, and may appear in the URIs in a pre-existing route set. This parameter is used to achieve backwards compatibility ...
... reg./redir. Contact/ default Req.-URI To From Contact R-R/Route external user -- o o o o o o password -- o o o o o o ...
... An implementation SHOULD NOT honor these obviously dangerous header fields: From, Call-ID, CSeq, Via, and Record-Route. An implementation SHOULD NOT honor any requested Route ...
... Record-Route. An implementation SHOULD NOT honor any requested Route header field values in order to not be used as an unwitting agent ...


... Proxy-Require R ar - o - o o o Record-Route R ar o o o o o - Record-Route 2xx,18x mr - o o o o - ...
... Record-Route R ar o o o o o - Record-Route 2xx,18x mr - o o o o - Reply-To - - - o - - ...
... 500,503 - o o o o o 600,603 - o o o o o Route R adr c c c c c c Server r - o o o o o Subject ...
... This allows automatic call distribution systems to route return calls to the originator of the first call. This also allows callees to filter ...
...