RFC 3738:Wave and Equation Based Rate Control (WEB...
RFC-Ref

WEBRC


Click on the red underlined text to get to the source

... This document specifies Wave and Equation Based Rate Control (WEBRC). WEBRC is a congestion control ...
... This document specifies Wave and Equation Based Rate Control (WEBRC). WEBRC is a congestion control building block that is designed to be massively scalable when used with the IP multicast ...
... IP multicast network service. WEBRC is also suitable as the basis for unicast congestion control, ...
... unicast congestion control, but this is outside the scope of this document. WEBRC is designed to compete fairly with TCP and similar congestion-controlled ...
... congestion-controlled sessions. WEBRC can be used as a congestion control protocol for any type of data delivery ...
... delivery. WEBRC is a receiver-driven congestion control protocol in the spirit ...
... channels to the network. A receiver using WEBRC adjusts its reception rate without regard for other concerns such as ...
... interwoven. WEBRC takes the same basic equation-based approach as TFRC [9]. In ...
... TFRC [9]. In particular, each WEBRC receiver measures parameters that are plugged into a TCP-like ...
... highest. WEBRC introduces a natural notion of a multicast round-trip time ...
... RTT, having some measure of RTT is essential in making the WEBRC equation-based rate control protocol "TCP-friendly ...
... receivers, and thus the efficiencies of multicast are realized. Furthermore, WEBRC is designed to be massively scalable in the sense that the sender is insensitive to the number of receivers ...
... multicast session. WEBRC is designed for applications that use a fixed packet size and vary their packet reception rates ...
... vary their packet reception rates in response to congestion. WEBRC is designed to be reasonably fair when competing for bandwidth with ...
... reception rate of a TCP flow under the same conditions. However WEBRC has a much lower variation of throughput over time compared to TCP ...
... TCP while competing fairly for bandwidth is that WEBRC responds more slowly than TCP to changes in available bandwidth ...
... sender is handling many concurrent connections and therefore WEBRC is suitable as a building block for multicast congestion control ...
... 16] and technical report [15] provide much of the rationale and intuition for the WEBRC design and describe some preliminary simulations. ...


... WEBRC provides congestion control for massively scalable protocols using the IP multicast ...
... network service. The congestion control that WEBRC provides is common to a variety of applications, including reliable content delivery and streaming applications. ...
... delivery and streaming applications. WEBRC is designed to provide congestion control for all packets that are sent to a session ...
... receiver is sufficient to reliably reconstruct the original object. A primary advantage of WEBRC is that each receiver controls it reception rate ...
... asynchronous delivery which are compatible with WEBRC, e.g., as described in [11]. When combined the result is a massively scalable, reliable, asynchronous ...
... delivery protocol that is network friendly. WEBRC also provides congestion control that is suitable for streaming applications. ...
... that is suitable for streaming applications. WEBRC avoids using techniques that are not massively scalable. For example, WEBRC does not provide any mechanisms for sending ...
... WEBRC avoids using techniques that are not massively scalable. For example, WEBRC does not provide any mechanisms for sending information from receivers to senders ...
... receivers to senders, although this does not rule out protocols that both use WEBRC and that send information from receivers to senders ...
... senders. WEBRC provides congestion control that can be tuned for different applications that may have differing application requirements ...
... traffic. WEBRC does not provide any support beyond congestion control, and thus WEBRC ...
... WEBRC does not provide any support beyond congestion control, and thus WEBRC is to be combined with other building blocks to provide a complete protocol instantiation. For example, WEBRC does not provide ...
... thus WEBRC is to be combined with other building blocks to provide a complete protocol instantiation. For example, WEBRC does not provide any means that can be used to identify which session each received ...
... any means that can be used to identify which session each received packet belongs to. As another example, WEBRC does not provide support for identifying which object each packet is carrying information about. ...


... A WEBRC session comprises a logically related set of channels ...
... time to carry data packets with a header carrying WEBRC Congestion Control Information. When packets are received, they are first checked to see that they belong to the appropriate session ...
... checked to see that they belong to the appropriate session before WEBRC is applied. A session label defined by a protocol instantiation may be carried in each packet to identify to which ...
... channel. The channels used by a WEBRC session are mapped uniquely to consecutive channel ...
... channel number that corresponds to the channel is carried in the WEBRC Congestion Control Information. A WEBRC receiver ...
... WEBRC Congestion Control Information. A WEBRC receiver uses the channel ...
... session. As time progresses, the current time slot index increases by one modulo T each TSD seconds. The current time slot index CTSI is carried in the WEBRC Congestion Control Information. This allows receivers ...
... session. WEBRC congestion control is achieved by having the sender send ...
... sender. A packet sequence number is carried in the WEBRC Congestion Control Information. The packet sequence numbers are consecutively ...
... the session and perform WEBRC congestion control. The session ...
... are secondary because their values will generally be fixed to default values that will not change, because they will be derived from SR_b, or because they are chosen based on non-WEBRC considerations. o LENP_B is the length of packets in bytes sent to the session ...
... The bulk of the complexity in WEBRC is in the receiver operation. For ease of explanation, suppose for the moment that during the ...
... MRTT. Both LOSSP and ARTT are moving averages of measurements based on discrete events. For many of the other estimates calculated by WEBRC, using an exponentially weighted moving average (EWMA) with a fixed averaging fraction is sufficient. However, the calculations of LOSSP ...
... TFRC [9]. The WEBRC receiver estimates the inverse of the average loss probability by applying two EWMA filters ...
... time-based filter is that the loss events in WEBRC are bursty; they typically occur just after a new wave has been joined. To smooth out this burstiness, the time-based filter ...
... WEBRC uses a slow start mechanism to quickly ramp up its rate at both the beginning of the session ...


... WEBRC is intended to be a congestion control scheme that can be used in a complete protocol instantiation that delivers objects and ...
... streams (both reliable content delivery and streaming of multimedia information). WEBRC is most applicable for delivery of objects or streams of substantial length, i.e., objects or streams that range ...
... WEBRC can be used with both multicast and unicast networks ...
... networks. However, the scope of this document is limited to multicast. WEBRC requires connectivity between a sender and receivers ...
... sender. WEBRC inherently works with all types of networks, including LANs, ...
... satellite networks. Thus, the inherent raw scalability of WEBRC is unlimited. However, in some network environments varying reception rates ...
... join and leave channels. This is the only dependency of WEBRC on the IP version. ...
... IP version. WEBRC requires receivers to be able to uniquely identify and demultiplex packets associated with a session ...
... document. WEBRC is presumed to be used with an underlying network or transport service that is a "best effort" service ...
... Multicast (SSM) model as defined in [10]. WEBRC works with both multicast models, but in a slightly different way with somewhat ...
... sender S sends packets to a multicast group G, and the WEBRC channel address ...
... packets to an SSM channel (S,G), and the WEBRC channel address ...
... multicast group address across the scope of the group, and this makes allocation of WEBRC channel addresses more difficult with ASM ...
... addresses more difficult with ASM. This is an issue for WEBRC because several channels are used per session. ...
... session. WEBRC channels and SSM channels ...
... channels coincide, and thus the receiver will only receive packets sent to the requested WEBRC channel. With ASM, ...
... filter out packets from unwanted sources. WEBRC assumes that the packet route between the sender and a ...
... receiver reaction to congestion may not be appropriate. Generally, the WEBRC receiver will act conservatively and reduce its reception rate ...


... Packets sent to a session using WEBRC MUST include Congestion Control Information fields as specified in this section. This document ...


... As described in RFC 3048 [4], WEBRC is a building block that is intended to be used, in conjunction with other building blocks, to ...
... help specify a protocol instantiation. WEBRC does not provide higher level session support, e.g., how receivers ...
... is support provided by other building blocks that can be used in conjunction with WEBRC to provide some of this support. For example, LCT [12 ...
... session support that may be needed by receivers, and the WEBRC Congestion Control Information (CCI) required in each packet can be carried in the CCI ...
... 12]. WEBRC does not provide any type of reliability, and in particular does not provide support for retransmission ...


... WEBRC can be subject to denial-of-service attacks by attackers ...
... authenticate each packet immediately upon receipt before the receiver performs any WEBRC actions based upon its receipt. Unfortunately, there are currently no practical multicast packet authentication ...
... TESLA could be used in conjunction with WEBRC to authenticate packets and for example terminate the session ...
... session upon detection of a forged packet. However, it is RECOMMENDED that the normal WEBRC receiver responses to received packets occur immediately -- not delayed by the TESLA ...
... TESLA authentication process. This is because the overall WEBRC performance would be greatly degraded if the receiver ...
... performance would be greatly degraded if the receiver delayed its WEBRC response to packet receipt for several seconds. ...
... A receiver with an incorrect or corrupted implementation of WEBRC may affect health of the network in the path between the sender ...
... Another vulnerability of WEBRC is the potential of receivers obtaining an incorrect session ...


... Goyal, V., "On WEBRC Wave Design and Server Implementation", Digital Fountain Technical Report no. DF2002-09-001, September 2002, available at http://www.digitalfountain.com/technology/. ...



Google
Web
RFC-Ref