RFC 3958:Domain-Based Application Service Location...
RFC-Ref

SRV Record


Click on the red underlined text to get to the source

... -- e.g., no A RR for an "A" target, no SRV record for an "S" target, or no NAPTR record ...


... possible to create very complex chains and dependencies with the NAPTR and SRV records. Therefore, domain ...
... RR that is retrieved points to more NAPTR or SRV records; each SRV record points to several A record lookups ...
... NAPTR or SRV records; each SRV record points to several A record lookups. ...
... o fewer branches is better: For both NAPTR and SRV records, provide different targets with varying preferences where appropriate ...
... services hosted elsewhere (i.e., where you cannot reasonably provide the SRV records in your own zone). ...


... service. See section 4.4 for an example that cannot be served by SRV records alone. ...
... service, yet the out-sourcer can independently rank the preference and ordering of servers. This independence is not achievable through the use of SRV records alone. Thus, to find the EM services ...
... hosting service's SRV records in the thinkingcat.example domain. ...
... "s" flag and a replacement fields of "_ProtB._tcp.example.com". So the client looks up SRV records for that target, ultimately making the request of the NS ...
... NS for example.com. 4. The response includes the SRV records listed in Section 4.3. 5. The client ...
... the SRV list -- looking up the A record for the SRV record's target (bigiron.example.com). ...
... IP address, on port 10001 (from the SRV record), by using ProtB over tcp. 10. The server responds with an "OK" message. ...


... inherent limitations. That is, although SRV records can be used to map from a specific service name and protocol for a specific domain ...
... service name and protocol for a specific domain to a specific server, SRV records are limited to one layer of indirection and are focused on server administration rather than on application naming. ...
... multiple levels of redirection before the target server machine with an SRV record is located, this proposal requires only a subset of NAPTR strictly bound to domain names ...
... So Why Not Just SRV Records? ...
... An expected question at this point is: this is so similar in structure to SRV records, why are we doing this with DDDS/NAPTR? ...
... for the uses described here. The basic answer is that SRV records provide mappings from protocol names to host and port ...


... DNS queries along the way. If any of them is compromised, bogus NAPTR and SRV records could be inserted to redirect clients to unintended destinations ...



Google
Web
RFC-Ref