RFC 4289:Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MI...
RFC-Ref

2. External Body Access Types


   [RFC2046] defines the message/external-body media type, whereby a
   MIME entity can act as pointer to the actual body data in lieu of
   including the data directly in the entity body.  Each
   message/external-body reference specifies an access type, which
   determines the mechanism used to retrieve the actual body data.  RFC
   2046draft defines an initial set of access types but allows for the
   registration of additional access types to accommodate new retrieval
   mechanisms.


2.1. Registration Requirements


   New access type specifications MUST conform to the requirements
   described below.


2.1.1. Naming Requirements


   Each access type MUST have a unique name.  This name appears in the
   access-type parameter in the message/external-body content-type
   header field and MUST conform to MIME content type parameter syntax.


2.1.2. Mechanism Specification Requirements


   All of the protocols, transports, and procedures used by a given
   access type MUST be described, either in the specification of the
   access type itself or in some other publicly available specification,
   in sufficient detail for the access type to be implemented by any
   competent implementor.  Use of secret and/or proprietary methods in
   access types is expressly prohibited.  The restrictions imposed by
   [RFC2026] on the standardization of patented algorithms must be
   respected as well.


2.1.3. Publication Requirements


   All access types MUST be described by an RFC.  The RFC may be
   informational rather than standards-track, although standards-track
   review and approval are encouraged for all access types.


2.1.4. Security Requirements


   Any known security issues that arise from the use of the access type
   MUST be completely and fully described.  It is not required that the
   access type be secure or that it be free from risks, but it is
   required that the known risks be identified.  Publication of a new
   access type does not require an exhaustive security review, and the
   security considerations section is subject to continuing evaluation.
   Additional security considerations SHOULD be addressed by publishing
   revised versions of the access type specification.


2.2. Registration Procedure


   Registration of a new access type starts with the publication of the
   specification as an Internet Draft.


2.2.1. Present the Access Type to the Community


   A proposed access type specification is sent to the
   "ietf-types@iana.org" mailing list for a two-week review period.
   This mailing list has been established for the purpose of reviewing
   proposed access and media types.  Proposed access types are not
   formally registered and must not be used.

   The intent of the public posting is to solicit comments and feedback
   on the access type specification and a review of any security
   considerations.


2.2.2. Access Type Reviewer


   When the two-week period has passed, the access type reviewer, who is
   appointed by the IETF Applications Area Director(s), either forwards
   the request to iana@iana.org or rejects it because of significant
   objections raised on the list.

   Decisions made by the reviewer must be posted to the ietf-types
   mailing list within 14 days.  Decisions made by the reviewer may be
   appealed to the IESG as specified in [RFC2026].


2.2.3. IANA Registration


   Provided that the access type either has passed review or has been
   successfully appealed to the IESG, the IANA will register the access
   type and make the registration available to the community.  The
   specification of the access type must also be published as an RFC.


2.3. Location of Registered Access Type List


   Access type registrations are listed by the IANA on the following web
   page:

     http://www.iana.org/assignments/access-types


2.4. IANA Procedures for Registering Access Types


   The identity of the access type reviewer is communicated to the IANA
   by the IESG.  The IANA then only acts either in response to access
   type definitions that are approved by the access type reviewer and
   forwarded to the IANA for registration, or in response to a
   communication from the IESG that an access type definition appeal has
   overturned the access type reviewer's ruling.



Google
Web
RFC-Ref